+ More Filters

Reset Filters

Title

Funding Organization

Funding Type

Eligible Country

Deadline

Other (Select all that apply)

Show Expired Programs

Show Verified Programs

Not Verified

Rural Health Clinic Technical Assistance Program

Department of Health and Human Services

General Information

Document Type:	Grants Notice
Opportunity Number:	HRSA-26-048
Opportunity Title:	Rural Health Clinic Technical Assistance Program
Opportunity Category:	Discretionary
Opportunity Category Explanation:
Funding Instrument Type:	Cooperative Agreement
Category of Funding Activity:	Health
Category Explanation:
Expected Number of Awards:	1
Assistance Listings:	93.692 -- Rural Health Delivery Information Systems
Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement:	No

Version:	Forecast 3
Forecasted Date:	May 06, 2026
Last Updated Date:	May 14, 2026
Estimated Post Date:	May 19, 2026
Estimated Application Due Date:	Jun 18, 2026 Electronically submitted applications must be submitted no later than 11:59 p.m., ET, on the listed application due date.
Estimated Award Date:	Jul 01, 2026
Estimated Project Start Date:	Jul 01, 2026
Fiscal Year:	2026
Archive Date:	Sep 30, 2026
Estimated Total Program Funding:	$ 110,000
Award Ceiling:	$ 110,000
Award Floor:	$ 0

This notice announces the opportunity to apply for funding under the Rural Health Clinic Technical Assistance Program. The Rural Health Clinic Technical Assistance (RHC TA) Program funds an entity to provide technical assistance (TA) to Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) through targeted support, specialized expertise, and guidance. The purpose of this program is to:

Identify key policy, regulatory, programmatic, and clinical issues facing RHCs.
Inform RHCs and other rural stakeholders about key RHC issues that affect, or could affect, health care delivery and improve care.
Identify and disseminate information on tools, resources, and strategies as possible solutions to challenges faced by RHCs.

AI Based Application Success Predictor

🌍 1. Strong Public Health Impact (Top Predictor)

HHS prioritizes:
- Projects that improve:
  - Population health
  - Healthcare access
  - Disease prevention
  - Health outcomes at scale

👉 Key question:
“Will this produce measurable public health benefit?”

🎯 2. Alignment with Agency & Program Priorities (Critical)

The single most important operational factor:

Strong alignment with:
- Specific Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)
- Strategic priorities of the issuing agency

Examples:

NIH → scientific innovation
CDC → prevention/public health implementation
HRSA → workforce/access
SAMHSA → behavioral health systems
ACF → children/families/social services

👉 Even strong projects fail if poorly aligned with the funding mechanism.

🔄 3. Translational & Real-World Implementation Relevance

Across HHS agencies, there is increasing emphasis on:

Translational science
Implementation research
Community-based interventions
Healthcare systems improvement

👉 Purely theoretical projects without practical impact are increasingly less competitive.

🌐 4. Health Equity & Underserved Population Focus (Major Differentiator)

One of the strongest department-wide priorities:

Reducing:
- Health disparities
- Structural inequities
- Barriers to care

High-priority populations:

Rural communities
Minority populations
Tribal communities
Low-income populations
Medically underserved groups

👉 Equity framing substantially improves competitiveness.

🤝 5. Strong Community & Institutional Partnerships

Competitive projects often include:

Universities
Hospitals
Public health departments
Community organizations
Tribal organizations
School systems

👉 Partnership strength demonstrates implementation capability.

📊 6. Measurable Outcomes & Evaluation Framework

HHS strongly favors:

Data-driven projects with:
- Clear metrics
- Defined milestones
- Evaluation plans
- Continuous monitoring

👉 Weak evaluation methodology is a major rejection factor.

👩‍⚕️ 7. Workforce Development & Capacity Building

Many HHS programs strongly prioritize:

Training healthcare workforce
Building institutional capacity
Expanding public health infrastructure

👉 Workforce impact often strengthens otherwise standard proposals.

🚀 8. Innovation with Scalable Public Benefit

High-success innovation areas include:

AI in healthcare
Digital health
Telehealth
Precision medicine
Community health technologies
Behavioral health innovation

👉 Innovation must be feasible, scalable, and policy-relevant.

🧪 9. Strong Organizational & Administrative Readiness

HHS reviews heavily evaluate:

Grants management capacity
Compliance systems
Staffing plans
Budget realism
Regulatory readiness

👉 Operational weakness can severely lower scores.

📈 10. Sustainability & Long-Term Systems Impact

Competitive projects usually include:

Sustainability plans
Institutional integration
Policy/system change potential

👉 HHS strongly values programs that continue after grant funding ends.

👩‍🔬 11. Strong Scientific or Programmatic Rigor

Depending on the agency:

NIH emphasizes:
- Scientific rigor and innovation
CDC/HRSA/SAMHSA emphasize:
- Programmatic rigor and implementation quality

👉 High-quality methodology is universally essential.

🧠 12. Dissemination & National Replicability

Strong proposals often explain:

How results can:
- Inform policy
- Scale nationally
- Influence guidelines
- Be replicated in other communities

👉 Broader applicability improves funding likelihood.

📊 Summary: Key Predictors (Ranked)

🔥 Highest impact factors:

Public health impact
Alignment with NOFO and agency priorities
Real-world implementation relevance

⚖️ Major differentiators:

Health equity focus
Strong partnerships
Measurable evaluation framework

📌 Supporting factors:

Workforce/capacity development
Sustainability
Innovation with scalability
Administrative readiness

💡 Insider Insight

Compared to private foundations:

United States Department of Health and Human Services funding is:
👉 highly structured
👉 extremely alignment-driven
👉 heavily focused on:
- measurable outcomes
- public health systems
- implementation feasibility
- accountability

👉 Winning formula:
Strong alignment with NOFO + measurable population impact + equity/community relevance + operational excellence

✔️ What wins:

Community and public health implementation programs
Workforce and healthcare access initiatives
Scalable translational health innovations
Equity-focused population health interventions
Strongly evaluated data-driven programs

❌ What struggles:

Poor NOFO alignment
Weak evaluation design
Limited implementation feasibility
Lack of sustainability or partnerships

Specialties

Public Health

Eligibility Requirements

Nonprofits that do not have a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education
Small businesses
State governments
Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification)
Independent school districts
Public and State controlled institutions of higher education
Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education
County governments
Private institutions of higher education
City or township governments
Special district governments
Native American tribal governments (Federally recognized)
Native American tribal organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments)
For profit organizations other than small businesses

Additional Information on Eligibility:

Only domestic organizations are eligible. "Domestic" means the 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau.

Sponsor Details

Sponsor Institute/Organizations: Department of Health and Human Services

Sponsor Type: Corporate/Non-Profit

Address: Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC 20201

Legal & Affiliation Disclaimer

Affiliation Disclaimer: Trialect operates independently and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by any sponsors or organizations posting on the GrantsBoard platform. As an independent aggregator of publicly available funding opportunities, Trialect provides equal access to information for all users without endorsing any specific funding source, content, organization, or sponsor. Trialect assumes no responsibility for the content posted by sponsors or third parties.

Subscription Disclaimer: Upon logging into Trialect, you may choose to SUBSCRIBE to GrantsBoard for timely notifications of funding opportunities and to access exclusive benefits, such as priority alerts, reminders, personalized recommendations, and additional application support. However, users are advised to contact sponsors directly for any questions and are not required to subscribe to engage with funding opportunities.

Content Ownership and Copyright Disclaimer: Trialect respects the intellectual property rights of all organizations and individuals. All content posted on GrantsBoard is provided solely for informational purposes and remains the property of the original owners. Trialect does not claim ownership of, nor does it have any proprietary interest in, content provided by third-party sponsors. Users are encouraged to verify content and ownership directly with the posting sponsor.

Fair Use Disclaimer: The information and content available on GrantsBoard are compiled from publicly accessible sources in alignment with fair use principles under U.S. copyright law. Trialect serves as an aggregator of this content, offering it to users in good faith and with the understanding that it is available for public dissemination. Any organization or individual who believes their intellectual property rights have been violated is encouraged to contact us for prompt resolution.

Third-Party Posting Responsibility Disclaimer: Trialect is a neutral platform that allows third-party sponsors to post funding opportunities for informational purposes only. Sponsors are solely responsible for ensuring that their postings comply with copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property laws. Trialect assumes no liability for any copyright or intellectual property infringements in third-party content and will take appropriate action to address any substantiated claims.

Accuracy and Verification Disclaimer: Trialect makes no warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information provided by sponsors. Users are advised to verify the details of any funding opportunity directly with the sponsor before taking action. Trialect cannot be held liable for any discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies in third-party postings.

Notice and Takedown Policy: Trialect is committed to upholding copyright law and protecting the rights of intellectual property owners. If you believe that content on GrantsBoard infringes your copyright or intellectual property rights, please contact us with detailed information about the claim. Upon receipt of a valid notice, Trialect will promptly investigate and, where appropriate, remove or disable access to the infringing content.

View Funding Opportunity