Trialect

Active

Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review: Basic Program

Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences
(5/5) - 6 reviews

Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.

Professor King Saud University

Main Areas of Interest

Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis
Designing and conducting a literature search
Data extraction and study selection
Assessing study quality and bias
Using tools like RevMan, Excel, and reference management software
Interpreting the results of systematic reviews

Specialties

Public Health

Techniques You Will Learn

Research question formulation and protocol development
Designing literature search strategies using academic databases
Systematic study selection and data extraction methods
Using RevMan for managing systematic reviews
Evaluating the quality of studies and understanding bias
Reading and writing systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Creating visualizations like forest plots using RevMan

Modules

Module 1: Introduction to Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis

Definition and importance
Differences from other review types
Steps in conducting a systematic review
Formulating a research question and developing a protocol

Module 2: Literature Search

Designing a literature search strategy
Using databases and managing references

Module 3: Data Extraction

Screening and selecting studies
Data extraction methods and tools

Module 4: Assessing Study Quality and Risk of Bias

Understanding study quality and risk of bias
Tools for assessing study quality (e.g., Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, ROBINS-I)
Conducting quality assessments
Addressing and managing bias in systematic reviews

Module 5: How to read and interpret the results of a systematic review

Tips to read a systematic review
Tips to write a meta-analysis

Major Publications

Dietary Fiber and Health Outcomes

Title: Dietary fiber and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Summary: This study is an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies on the impact of dietary fiber on various health outcomes.
Publication: The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2018.

Vitamin K Antagonists' Use and Fracture Risk

Title: Vitamin K antagonists' use and fracture risk: results from a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Summary: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the risk of fractures in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists compared to those not using these medications.
Publication: Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2015.

Clinical Prognostic Factors for Older People

Title: Clinical prognostic factors for older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Summary: This review explores the accuracy and precision of prognostic tools used in geriatric medicine to predict adverse health outcomes in older adults.
Publication: Ageing Research Reviews, 2024.

Prognostic Impact of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Colorectal Cancer

Title: Prognostic impact and implications of extracapsular lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Summary: This study assesses the prognostic significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer through systematic review and meta-analysis.
Publication: Annals of Oncology, 2016.

Deprescribing and Health Outcomes

Title: Efficacy of deprescribing on health outcomes: An umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Summary: This umbrella review examines the effects of deprescribing interventions on health outcomes across different settings in medicine.
Publication: Ageing Research Reviews, 2024.

Nicola Veronese's extensive research has made significant contributions to the medical community, particularly in understanding the complex interplay between aging, chronic diseases, and overall health outcomes.

Program Fee


Total Number of Modules	5
Time duration of Each module	40 minutes
Total Program Cost	$625

This program allows Merit Applications. This program allows merit-based applications for virtual and onsite clinical and research programs. If you are successfully awarded under this category, Trialect or the host mentor will cover the tuition fee only. All applications will be evaluated based on merit. Due to the high level of competition, the chances of being selected under the merit category are quite limited.

Who Can Apply

All those interested in systematic reviews and meta-analysis

Host Details

Host Name: Nicola Veronese

Affiliation: Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences

Address: Via di Sant'Alessandro, 8, 00131 Roma RM, Italy

Website URL: https://www.unicamillus.org/

Disclaimer:It is mandatory that all applicants carry workplace liability insurance, e.g., https://www.protrip-world-liability.com (Erasmus students use this package and typically costs around 5 € per month - please check) in addition to health insurance when you join any of the onsite Trialect partnered fellowships.

Legal & Affiliation Disclaimer

Affiliation Disclaimer: Trialect operates independently and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by any sponsors or organizations posting on the GrantsBoard platform. As an independent aggregator of publicly available funding opportunities, Trialect provides equal access to information for all users without endorsing any specific funding source, content, organization, or sponsor. Trialect assumes no responsibility for the content posted by sponsors or third parties.

Subscription Disclaimer: Upon logging into Trialect, you may choose to SUBSCRIBE to GrantsBoard for timely notifications of funding opportunities and to access exclusive benefits, such as priority alerts, reminders, personalized recommendations, and additional application support. However, users are advised to contact sponsors directly for any questions and are not required to subscribe to engage with funding opportunities.

Content Ownership and Copyright Disclaimer: Trialect respects the intellectual property rights of all organizations and individuals. All content posted on GrantsBoard is provided solely for informational purposes and remains the property of the original owners. Trialect does not claim ownership of, nor does it have any proprietary interest in, content provided by third-party sponsors. Users are encouraged to verify content and ownership directly with the posting sponsor.

Fair Use Disclaimer: The information and content available on GrantsBoard are compiled from publicly accessible sources in alignment with fair use principles under U.S. copyright law. Trialect serves as an aggregator of this content, offering it to users in good faith and with the understanding that it is available for public dissemination. Any organization or individual who believes their intellectual property rights have been violated is encouraged to contact us for prompt resolution.

Third-Party Posting Responsibility Disclaimer: Trialect is a neutral platform that allows third-party sponsors to post funding opportunities for informational purposes only. Sponsors are solely responsible for ensuring that their postings comply with copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property laws. Trialect assumes no liability for any copyright or intellectual property infringements in third-party content and will take appropriate action to address any substantiated claims.

Accuracy and Verification Disclaimer: Trialect makes no warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information provided by sponsors. Users are advised to verify the details of any funding opportunity directly with the sponsor before taking action. Trialect cannot be held liable for any discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies in third-party postings.

Notice and Takedown Policy: Trialect is committed to upholding copyright law and protecting the rights of intellectual property owners. If you believe that content on GrantsBoard infringes your copyright or intellectual property rights, please contact us with detailed information about the claim. Upon receipt of a valid notice, Trialect will promptly investigate and, where appropriate, remove or disable access to the infringing content.

Live Interactive One-On-One (Virtual)

Fellowship - Basic/Translational/Clinical Research Program

Italy

Application Review Deadline:

Dec 15th, 2025

Apply Now

Featured Reviews

5

6 reviews

Excellent

Very good

Average

Poor

Terrible

--The program was excellent! I learned so much about meta-analysis and systematic reviews. The mentorship was top-notch. rating = 5/5 --I absolutely loved this program. The research opportunities were countless and the networking was incredibly beneficial. rating = 5/5 --This program has been instrumental in my professional growth. The hands-on clinical research experience was the highlight for me. rating = 5/5 --The mentorship in this program is truly one of a kind. The mentors were not only knowledgeable but also very supportive. rating = 5/5 --The opportunities to collaborate and network in this program are immense. I even got to publish my own research article. rating = 5/5 --I loved the exposure to French culture and the chance to practice my language skills. It was a great change of research environment. rating = 5/5

🌟 Overall Sentiment: Highly Positive

Participants of the "Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review: Basic Program" gave it a rating of 5/5. They particularly praised its high-quality mentorship, extensive research opportunities, and beneficial networking events.

Key Strengths

🧑‍🔬 Hands-on Clinical Research Experience – Participants gained valuable exposure to meta-analysis and systematic reviews.
👨‍🏫 Supportive & Knowledgeable Mentors – The mentors received high praise for their expertise and guidance.
🤝 Collaboration & Networking – Participants had the opportunity to publish their own research articles and network extensively.
🌍 Cultural & Professional Exposure – Participants had the chance to immerse in French culture, practice their language skills, and explore a new research environment.

Priya Deshmukh 1 month ago

(5/5)

Review and Highlights: What stood out or was most valuable during your fellowship: During the virtual/ online fellowship, I was able to deepen my knowledge and understanding of my earlier readings on systematic reviews and meta-analysis. In particular, this fellowship helped me to understand the concepts and tenets for evaluating studies better (especially, for the randomized clinical trials). Dr. Veronese had developed great presentation slides that played a pivotal role in reinforcing the concepts. Dr. Veronese had up-to-date knowledge on this topic and was well-versed with the workings of the search engines and software. He kept the learning process a two-way process, flexible, and interactive. For example, I researched and decided on a topic for systematic review training and he approved it. Additionally, during the fellowship period, I submitted a few documents doing my "homework" on PUBMED MeSH terms/ searches on the topic and on the final sorting and approving of the references for the systematic review analysis and he was very appreciative of those documents that helped me to boost my confidence. One thing that consistently stood out during the entirety of my fellowship experience was Dr. Veronese’s receptiveness to answer my questions promptly during the virtual sessions.
Improvements: Any suggestions on how we can enhance the program: Since this program is online, one thing I would suggest is to allow the mentee to get access/ download the software programs for search engines /or analysis (at least temporarily) and this would help to enhance the practicality of the program. Also, I would prefer the program to culminate into a peer reviewed manuscript for publication in the near future.

Visa Process: Any suggestions regarding the type of visa and tips for success: Not applicable since this program is virtual
Travel and Accommodations: Any recommendations on accommodations and nearby eating places Not applicable since this program is virtual
With your permission, we’d love to post and share your review (contact info only if requested and approved by you) Please do not disclose my contact information.
Overall Rating: Please rate your experience on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 being outstanding) (4.7)

Alejandro cardozo ocampo 1 month ago

(5/5)

I really enjoyed the experience. Dr. Nicola is an expert on the
subject. He's patient, has great teaching skills and is also good at
answering questions on the topics he's familiar with.

Richa Gupta 2 months ago

(5/5)

I completed the Trialect Virtual Fellowship in "Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review" under Dr. Nicola Veronese, Faculty at University of Palermo, ITALY.

I had a truly wonderful experience learning under the guidance of Dr. Nicola Veronese. He is not only an excellent teacher but also an inspiring mentor. Since this was a virtual fellowship, there were several unexpected challenges, such as network issues and time-zone differences—given that I was attending from India while he conducted the sessions from Italy. Despite these hurdles, Dr. Veronese handled everything with remarkable patience and professionalism. He was always willing to adjust the schedule whenever needed, ensuring that learning was never compromised.

What impressed me the most was his teaching style. His explanations are clear, engaging, and thoughtfully structured. He addresses every question with great patience, listens attentively to his students, and provides detailed, meaningful responses that deepen understanding.

I am deeply grateful for the knowledge and mentorship I have received from him, and on this occasion, I wish him a heartfelt “Happy Teacher’s Day.”

Ayodele 3 months ago

(5/5)

It was a pleasure learning under the tutelage of Professor Veronese. Not only did he improve on my knowledge of Systematic reviews, he was very patient to put me through the practicalities and had useful suggestions for me.

In fact I am looking forward to the next part of the course which is the meta analysis part.

My gratitude to Trialect for the useful connections that I have been linked to since 2019 when I got wind of your organisation.

I will continue to recommend your institution to students and my professional colleagues like wise.

Dr.Deborah 3 months ago

(5/5)

1. I understood and learned a lot about systematic review searches and terms. I did not touch much on meta-analysis.

2. I was able to apply the tools to my research well.

3. Yes, I was provided with pre-meeting tasks to try so that we could engage during the meeting on difficulties ex[erienced.

4. I feel that systematic review and meta-analysis are topics which need separate attention. It is too much to cover both in 5 lessons which are 45 mins.

5. As above. The training as a whole was very helpful.

Meeta Burande 3 months ago

(5/5)

The training is still going on, as we have scheduled only 1 lecture tll now.

I have been assigned the the work for that -that is to formulate the systemic review questions and search the literature.

as it was the big task, it took time to complete.

today we are going to schedule the further sessions.

this is the very good real time training session with application to apply it actually... the best concept in training to apply it, understand it and then we will move further

all virtual training will improve, if we may have written transcripts or real time subtitles in video, coz the difference in ascents may cause different pronunciation to understand, especially for people whose primary language is not english.

i will update you further progress

Thank you