+ More Filters

Reset Filters

Title

Funding Organization

Funding Type

Eligible Country

Deadline

Other (Select all that apply)

Show Expired Programs

Show Verified Programs

Not Verified

Society for Military Psychology (Division 19) -- Student Research Grant

American Psychological Association

The Society for Military Psychology (APA Division 19) offers annual Division 19 Student Research Grants to encourage cutting-edge research related to all aspects of military psychology. The purpose of the Division 19 Student Research Grant program is to assist graduate/undergraduate students of psychology (clinical, I/O, cognitive, applied, etc.) with costs associated with conducting research.

Up to two (2) Student Research Grants of up to $2250 each will be awarded annually. This annual award will be presented to students whose research reflects excellence in military psychology. As part of the application budget, applicants may request up to $750 in dedicated travel funds to aid with presenting the research at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention or a Division 19 Conference. All applicants are highly encouraged to present their findings at a conference and/or publication.

Non-travel funds can be disbursed shortly after funding notice. Travel funds are disbursed after demonstrating need (e.g., email indicating conference abstract was accepted) or after travel (e.g., receipts from conference attendance).

Note: If disbursed to an individual, funding receipt is a tax event; if disbursed to organization, it is not an individual tax liability.

Applications can be submitted April 1 to June 1.

Review Criteria

Proposals will be evaluated by a committee of scientific peers to determine which efforts are of highest quality to merit grant support. The following criteria will be used to evaluate each proposal:

1. Research approach: An assessment of the overall quality of the conceptual framework, design, methods, and planned analyses. Relevance: Does the proposed research address a relevant topic for the science of military psychology?

2. Significance: Does the proposal address an important problem relevant to both the academic and practitioner membership of the Society for Military Psychology? Will the proposal advance knowledge and practice in a given area?

3. Innovativeness: Does the proposed research employ novel concepts, approaches or methods? Does the proposal research have original and innovative aims?

4. Realism (Feasibility): Will the project be completed within one year of award date? Does the student have adequate support from their Advisor and Department? Does the student have explicit plans to present findings?

5. Appropriateness of budget: Is there clear justification and rationale for the expenditure of the award monies? Can the proposed work be accomplished with the funds requested or is there evidence that additional expenses will be covered by other sources of funding?

AI Based Application Success Predictor

1. Strong psychological science relevance

The most competitive applications clearly address important questions in:

clinical psychology,
behavioral science,
cognitive psychology,
developmental psychology,
social psychology,
health psychology,
neuropsychology,
educational psychology,
community psychology.

Strong alignment with psychological science and APA priorities is essential.

2. Clear societal or mental-health impact

APA reviewers strongly value projects that may:

improve mental-health outcomes,
reduce health disparities,
improve behavioral interventions,
strengthen public well-being,
influence policy or education,
enhance evidence-based practice.

Applications with real-world applicability generally score higher.

3. Strong methodological rigor

Competitive proposals usually demonstrate:

robust study design,
validated psychological measures,
appropriate statistics,
reproducibility,
ethical safeguards,
realistic recruitment plans.

Methodological quality is one of the strongest predictors of success.

4. Innovation balanced with feasibility

Successful applications often combine:

novel psychological frameworks,
emerging intervention models,
innovative technologies,
interdisciplinary integration

with achievable aims and realistic timelines.

Overly ambitious projects often receive criticism.

5. Diversity, equity, and inclusion relevance

APA increasingly prioritizes research involving:

underserved populations,
racial/ethnic disparities,
LGBTQ+ mental health,
disability inclusion,
culturally responsive interventions,
access-to-care inequities.

Meaningful DEI integration can substantially strengthen applications.

6. Strong publication and scholarly track record

Successful applicants commonly demonstrate:

peer-reviewed publications,
conference presentations,
prior research experience,
statistical/research competence,
consistent scholarly productivity.

For early-career programs, trajectory and potential may matter more than volume.

7. Strong mentorship and institutional environment

For trainees and junior investigators, reviewers heavily consider:

mentor expertise,
research infrastructure,
protected research time,
interdisciplinary collaboration,
training environment quality.

Strong mentorship is a major predictor of success in APA fellowships and early-career awards.

8. Clear translational or implementation potential

High-scoring proposals frequently explain:

how findings could influence therapy,
educational systems,
workplace wellness,
community interventions,
healthcare delivery,
behavioral policy.

APA strongly values actionable psychology.

9. Interdisciplinary collaboration

Competitive projects often involve:

psychiatrists,
neuroscientists,
educators,
public-health researchers,
data scientists,
social workers,
policy experts.

Cross-disciplinary integration improves reviewer confidence.

10. Strong alignment with specific APA division priorities

Applications tailored to a specific APA division or funding mechanism tend to perform better than generic submissions.

Examples include:

trauma psychology,
addiction psychology,
pediatric psychology,
military psychology,
psychotherapy research,
aging and cognition,
school psychology.

Common Reasons for Rejection

Frequent reviewer concerns include:

vague hypotheses,
weak statistical planning,
insufficient theoretical grounding,
lack of novelty,
poor feasibility,
limited societal relevance,
inadequate recruitment strategy,
weak alignment with funding priorities.

Highest-Probability Applicant Profile

The strongest APA applications usually combine:

rigorous psychological methodology + clinically or socially meaningful question + strong mentorship/publication record + DEI relevance + realistic implementation potential

Specialties

Psychology

Eligibility Requirements

Enrolled and in good standing in a graduate/undergraduate program in psychology

A Student Affiliate of Division 19

With a proposal that has been approved by a faculty advisor prior to application

The proposed research is related to military psychology, including, but not limited to, clinical research and industrial/organizational research

Agree to complete a 6-month and 12-month report on the progress of your award

Sponsor Details

Sponsor Institute/Organizations: American Psychological Association

Sponsor Type: Corporate/Non-Profit

Address: 750 First St NE Washington, D.C. 20002

Legal & Affiliation Disclaimer

Affiliation Disclaimer: Trialect operates independently and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by any sponsors or organizations posting on the GrantsBoard platform. As an independent aggregator of publicly available funding opportunities, Trialect provides equal access to information for all users without endorsing any specific funding source, content, organization, or sponsor. Trialect assumes no responsibility for the content posted by sponsors or third parties.

Subscription Disclaimer: Upon logging into Trialect, you may choose to SUBSCRIBE to GrantsBoard for timely notifications of funding opportunities and to access exclusive benefits, such as priority alerts, reminders, personalized recommendations, and additional application support. However, users are advised to contact sponsors directly for any questions and are not required to subscribe to engage with funding opportunities.

Content Ownership and Copyright Disclaimer: Trialect respects the intellectual property rights of all organizations and individuals. All content posted on GrantsBoard is provided solely for informational purposes and remains the property of the original owners. Trialect does not claim ownership of, nor does it have any proprietary interest in, content provided by third-party sponsors. Users are encouraged to verify content and ownership directly with the posting sponsor.

Fair Use Disclaimer: The information and content available on GrantsBoard are compiled from publicly accessible sources in alignment with fair use principles under U.S. copyright law. Trialect serves as an aggregator of this content, offering it to users in good faith and with the understanding that it is available for public dissemination. Any organization or individual who believes their intellectual property rights have been violated is encouraged to contact us for prompt resolution.

Third-Party Posting Responsibility Disclaimer: Trialect is a neutral platform that allows third-party sponsors to post funding opportunities for informational purposes only. Sponsors are solely responsible for ensuring that their postings comply with copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property laws. Trialect assumes no liability for any copyright or intellectual property infringements in third-party content and will take appropriate action to address any substantiated claims.

Accuracy and Verification Disclaimer: Trialect makes no warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information provided by sponsors. Users are advised to verify the details of any funding opportunity directly with the sponsor before taking action. Trialect cannot be held liable for any discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies in third-party postings.

Notice and Takedown Policy: Trialect is committed to upholding copyright law and protecting the rights of intellectual property owners. If you believe that content on GrantsBoard infringes your copyright or intellectual property rights, please contact us with detailed information about the claim. Upon receipt of a valid notice, Trialect will promptly investigate and, where appropriate, remove or disable access to the infringing content.

View Funding Opportunity