Studio Red/Go Red for Women Fund/AHA invites researchers, clinicians, entrepreneurs, and innovators to submit pre-proposals for funding consideration to advance groundbreaking research and novel solutions in women’s health. Selected pre-proposals will be invited to submit full proposals for competitive grants that aim to close critical knowledge and care gaps.
A total of $1 million is available to fund up to 10 investigators / investigative teams proposing innovative technologies that disproportionally or exclusively impact women’s health.
During the 1-year award period, Studio Red will provide support and educational content on IP, regulatory strategy, reimbursement and commercialization strategies, fundraising and pitch development etc. to grantees via monthly webinar sessions for the duration of the grant period.
At the conclusion of the award period, 1-2 awardees may be selected for advancement in Studio Red. Studio teams would support the top 1-2 grantees and incubate the early company formation process helping the team reach key funding milestones. Upon successful completion of the Studio Red incubation process, the goal would be to have at least one of these companies created and ready for follow on funding and external launch.
Despite significant progress in biomedical research, many conditions that disproportionately, differently, or distinctly impact women remain underdiagnosed, undertreated, and underfunded. This call focuses on four priority areas where transformative science and innovation are urgently needed:
Conditions that disproportionally impact women or present differently in women, but treat both men and women:
Conditions that distinctly impact women:
Translational potential:
Only proposals with a feasible path for implementation, scalability and potential commercialization will be considered. Awards will be made only to eligible nonprofit institutions described in the Relevant Policies and Requirements section below. However, inclusion of subcontracted industry partners who have expertise in key areas of the proposed studies is encouraged.
Governance/Oversight:
Studio Red will provide support and educational content on IP, regulatory strategy, reimbursement and commercialization strategies, fundraising and pitch development etc. to grantees via monthly webinar sessions for the duration of the grant period.
Timelines and Milestones:
Grantees will present their work at a virtual midpoint presentation to key stakeholders from AHA, including Studio Red, GRFW Fund, and AHA broadly. Feedback, including additional recommendations and programming to support the remainder of the grant period, and final presentation selection criteria will be provided at this meeting
Final presentations will be held at the end of the award period where 1-2 ideas may be selected for Studio Red incubation.
$100,000 per year, including 10 percent indirect costs.
The award may be used for salary and fringe benefits of the principal investigator, collaborating investigator(s), and other participants with faculty appointments, and for project-related expenses, such as salaries of technical personnel essential to the conduct of the project, supplies, equipment, computers/electronics, travel (including international travel), volunteer subject costs, data management, and publication costs, etc. The proposed budget must be justified in the application.
AHA does not require use of the NIH salary cap.
Award Duration: 1 year. No-cost extensions are not allowed, and the awards are non-renewable.
Number of Awards: The American Heart Association anticipates awarding up to 10 awards.
Total Award Amount: $100,000 per selected projected
Awardees will be selected based on scientific merit and how each investigator aligns with the Association’s mission to be a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives.
The Heart Association reserves the right to determine the final award amount for competitive projects based on need and potential impact.
These are factors that strongly correlate with AHA-funded applications:
| Predictor | Importance | How to Show It |
|---|---|---|
| Alignment with AHA mission / cardiovascular/brain health relevance | Reviewers explicitly score whether the proposal “addresses an important problem … that will help achieve AHA’s mission: a world of longer, healthier lives.” professional.heart.org+1 | Clearly state how your work addresses cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or brain health; show the population/disease relevance. |
| Applicant credentials & career stage appropriateness | For many awards (e.g., fellowships, career development), AHA assesses whether the applicant is at the appropriate stage and has potential to become an independent investigator. professional.heart.org+1 | Ensure eligibility criteria are met; highlight past publications, prior work, potential trajectory. |
| Mentorship/training plan & research environment | Especially for fellowship and early-career awards, AHA requires strong mentor involvement, institutional resources, and protected time. professional.heart.org+1 | Provide a robust mentorship plan, institutional commitment letter, description of resources. |
| Scientific quality, innovation, feasibility | Proposal must have a clear hypothesis or aims, rigorous methods, appropriate scope, and feasible timeline/budget. professional.heart.org+2professional.heart.org+2 | Present sharp aims, realistic deliverables, robust methodology, justification of sample size, feasibility evidence. |
| Preliminary data / proof‐of‐concept (when applicable) | While not always required (especially for very early stage), having preliminary results improves credibility of feasibility and methodology. professional.heart.org | Provide pilot data or justify why none is required and how feasibility will be addressed. |
| Clear non‐scientist summary & broader impact | AHA uses lay reviewers who evaluate how well the science is communicated and how it supports their mission. professional.heart.org | Write a clear, concise summary in lay language; emphasize patient/population impact, public health relevance. |
| Ethical, regulatory compliance & research standards | AHA has standards for human subjects, animals, data sharing, bias, inclusive environment, etc. professional.heart.org+1 | Include statements on IRB/animal care approval, diversity/inclusion, data management, sex as biological variable. |
| Adherence to eligibility and application instructions | Applications failing eligibility, membership, format, or guidelines are at risk of triage or rejection. professional.heart.org+1 | Check eligibility (citizenship, institution type, membership), follow format exactly, include required documents. |
| Budget aligned with project scope and award‐type | Over-ambitious budgets or mismatched scope reduce competitiveness. AHA provides budget instructions. professional.heart.org | Justify each cost, keep scope manageable, align budget with deliverables and award size. |
| Focus on underserved/health‐equity populations and emerging areas | AHA has growing emphasis on health equity, data science, and translational impact. professional.heart.org | If applicable, highlight how project addresses disparities, uses novel approaches, or aligns with strategic AHA topics. |
Weak linkage to cardiovascular/cerebrovascular/brain health (too generic biomedical).
Aims too broad, too many aims, or unrealistic deliverables for the award timeline.
Mentorship/training plan is shallow, institutional support unclear.
Preliminary data lacking when required and not justified.
Non-scientist summary unclear or too technical.
Failing eligibility (career stage, institution, membership) or missing required documents.
Budget disproportionate to proposed aims.
Not addressing diversity/inclusion or sex/biological variable when required.
Successful AHA applications typically:
Directly address cardiovascular, cerebrovascular or brain health in a way that aligns with AHA’s mission.
Are led by investigators whose career stage and track record match the award type, within a strong institutional environment with protected time.
Have focused, feasible aims, rigorous methodology, and adequate preliminary support or justification.
Include a clear lay summary and articulate the broader impact on health, patients or populations.
Meet all eligibility and application requirements, including responsible research practices and budget justification.
At the time of award activation:
Sponsor Institute/Organizations: American Heart Association
Sponsor Type: Corporate/Non-Profit
Address: 7272 Greenville Ave. Dallas, TX 75231
Affiliation Disclaimer: Trialect operates independently and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by any sponsors or organizations posting on the GrantsBoard platform. As an independent aggregator of publicly available funding opportunities, Trialect provides equal access to information for all users without endorsing any specific funding source, content, organization, or sponsor. Trialect assumes no responsibility for the content posted by sponsors or third parties.
Subscription Disclaimer: Upon logging into Trialect, you may choose to SUBSCRIBE to GrantsBoard for timely notifications of funding opportunities and to access exclusive benefits, such as priority alerts, reminders, personalized recommendations, and additional application support. However, users are advised to contact sponsors directly for any questions and are not required to subscribe to engage with funding opportunities.
Content Ownership and Copyright Disclaimer: Trialect respects the intellectual property rights of all organizations and individuals. All content posted on GrantsBoard is provided solely for informational purposes and remains the property of the original owners. Trialect does not claim ownership of, nor does it have any proprietary interest in, content provided by third-party sponsors. Users are encouraged to verify content and ownership directly with the posting sponsor.
Fair Use Disclaimer: The information and content available on GrantsBoard are compiled from publicly accessible sources in alignment with fair use principles under U.S. copyright law. Trialect serves as an aggregator of this content, offering it to users in good faith and with the understanding that it is available for public dissemination. Any organization or individual who believes their intellectual property rights have been violated is encouraged to contact us for prompt resolution.
Third-Party Posting Responsibility Disclaimer: Trialect is a neutral platform that allows third-party sponsors to post funding opportunities for informational purposes only. Sponsors are solely responsible for ensuring that their postings comply with copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property laws. Trialect assumes no liability for any copyright or intellectual property infringements in third-party content and will take appropriate action to address any substantiated claims.
Accuracy and Verification Disclaimer: Trialect makes no warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information provided by sponsors. Users are advised to verify the details of any funding opportunity directly with the sponsor before taking action. Trialect cannot be held liable for any discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies in third-party postings.
Notice and Takedown Policy: Trialect is committed to upholding copyright law and protecting the rights of intellectual property owners. If you believe that content on GrantsBoard infringes your copyright or intellectual property rights, please contact us with detailed information about the claim. Upon receipt of a valid notice, Trialect will promptly investigate and, where appropriate, remove or disable access to the infringing content.
Jan 06, 2026
Feb 14, 2026
$100,000
Affiliation: American Heart Association
Address: 7272 Greenville Ave. Dallas, TX 75231
Disclaimer:It is mandatory that all applicants carry workplace liability insurance, e.g., https://www.protrip-world-liability.com (Erasmus students use this package and typically costs around 5 € per month - please check) in addition to health insurance when you join any of the onsite Trialect partnered fellowships.