+ More Filters

Reset Filters

Title

Funding Organization

Funding Type

Eligible Country

Deadline

Other (Select all that apply)

Show Expired Programs

Show Verified Programs

Verified

Medical Student Project Prize

British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS)

This prize recognises the contribution of medical students in the completion of clinical audit, service transformation and small research projects in the field of gynaecological oncology. The application should be supported by a supervisor who is a BGCS member
Value of prize: £100
Number of awards per year: 7

AI Based Application Success Predictor

✅ 1. Clear and direct relevance to gynaecological cancers

Highest scoring proposals target:

Ovarian cancer

Endometrial cancer

Cervical cancer (including HPV-related disease)

Vulval/vaginal cancer

Rare gynaecological tumours

Indirect oncology with little gynecologic anchoring → low enthusiasm.

✅ 2. Measurable clinical benefit

Panels consistently reward:

Earlier diagnosis

Improved staging accuracy

Reduced diagnostic delays

Surgical/operative decision support

Treatment toxicity reduction

Optimization of follow-up

Proposals must clearly articulate patient-facing impact.

✅ 3. Strong feasibility with small budgets

BGCS grants are typically modest. Prior awardees succeed by:

Using existing infrastructure

Leveraging institutional datasets

Employing simple, targeted intervention studies

Massively scoped molecular projects are considered mis-aligned.

✅ 4. Integration into UK clinical practice

Reviewers respond positively to:

NHS pathway improvement

MDT workflow optimization

Guideline-aligned QI projects

Real-world observational cohorts

Connection to UK practice context is a powerful predictor.

✅ 5. Quality improvement + audit orientation

A very common successful theme:

variations in care delivery

adherence to NICE/BGCS guidance

surgical outcome tracking

survivorship pathway optimization

Audits with prospective intervention → strong scores.

✅ 6. Patient experience and survivorship

Well-scoring focus areas include:

sexual health outcomes

fertility preservation

psychological support models

follow-up burden reduction

Panels value person-centered oncology.

✅ 7. Early-career uplift

BGCS awards are intentionally friendly to:

trainees

junior faculty

surgeons-in-training

early clinical academics

Mentored proposals succeed disproportionately.

✅ 8. Data-driven modest innovation

Successful projects often use:

retrospective cohort analytics

simple biomarker feasibility explorations

imaging refinement approaches

surgical decision support scoring

Ambitious omics screens without follow-up plans typically fail.

✅ 9. Strong mentorship

Prior awardees nearly always have:

senior consultant oversight

clinical academic supervision

letters supporting access to data/patients

Weak mentorship → reviewer concern.

✅ 10. Immediate impact on practice variation

BGCS places value on:

standardized care algorithms

equitable treatment access

audit-driven service redesign

Demonstrating variation → proposing remedy = high success likelihood.

🧬 Scientific Themes Noticed Among Recent Successes

Early detection pathways for ovarian cancer

HPV vaccination programme optimization

Sentinel node mapping refinement

Robotic surgical outcomes

Predictive toxicity monitoring

📉 Common Reviewer Critiques (predictors of failure)

✘ Scope too large for award size
✘ Weak justification of gynecologic cancer specificity
✘ Little novelty (e.g., descriptive audits without intervention)
✘ No statistical plan / insufficient power
✘ Application appears duplicative or extension of existing funding
✘ Risk of poor recruitment feasibility

📐 Ideal Aim Structure (BGCS-aligned)

Aim 1 — Quantify care variation or diagnostic gap
Aim 2 — Implement targeted intervention / algorithm
Aim 3 — Evaluate improvement in measurable clinical endpoints

Two well-defined aims > three unfocused ones.

👥 Awardee Profile Patterns

Successful PIs typically show:

a handful of specialty-relevant publications,

track record of QI or audit engagement,

oncology MDT involvement,

clinical workflow insight.

📊 Methodological Patterns of Winners

Prospective observational studies

Pragmatic clinical triallets

Audit → guideline-implementation → re-audit loops

Structured questionnaires with validated scales

Imaging modality comparative assessment

💰 Budget Predictors of Success

Good budgets:

cost-neutral analytics from existing data

modest biostatistics support

participant recruitment expenses

imaging/assay test fees

Reviewers dislike:

equipment purchases

vague consumable categories

general admin overhead

🏁 Top Predictive Factors (Condensed)

A competitive BGCS proposal is:
✅ small, focused, feasible
✅ clinically meaningful
✅ relevant to UK practice variation
✅ trainee-friendly / mentored
✅ anchored to measurable patient outcomes
✅ improvement-oriented, not merely descriptive

Specialties

Cancer

Oncology

Gynecology

Eligibility Requirements

The majority of awards are for members of the BGCS only. Some specific awards are open to non-members. You must satisfy the criteria of the award at the time of application, not at the time of the award being given.

Eligible Countries:

United Kingdom

Sponsor Details

Sponsor Institute/Organizations: British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS)

Sponsor Type: Corporate/Non-Profit

Address: Consultant Gynaecological Surgeon, The Royal Marsden, London

Legal & Affiliation Disclaimer

Affiliation Disclaimer: Trialect operates independently and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by any sponsors or organizations posting on the GrantsBoard platform. As an independent aggregator of publicly available funding opportunities, Trialect provides equal access to information for all users without endorsing any specific funding source, content, organization, or sponsor. Trialect assumes no responsibility for the content posted by sponsors or third parties.

Subscription Disclaimer: Upon logging into Trialect, you may choose to SUBSCRIBE to GrantsBoard for timely notifications of funding opportunities and to access exclusive benefits, such as priority alerts, reminders, personalized recommendations, and additional application support. However, users are advised to contact sponsors directly for any questions and are not required to subscribe to engage with funding opportunities.

Content Ownership and Copyright Disclaimer: Trialect respects the intellectual property rights of all organizations and individuals. All content posted on GrantsBoard is provided solely for informational purposes and remains the property of the original owners. Trialect does not claim ownership of, nor does it have any proprietary interest in, content provided by third-party sponsors. Users are encouraged to verify content and ownership directly with the posting sponsor.

Fair Use Disclaimer: The information and content available on GrantsBoard are compiled from publicly accessible sources in alignment with fair use principles under U.S. copyright law. Trialect serves as an aggregator of this content, offering it to users in good faith and with the understanding that it is available for public dissemination. Any organization or individual who believes their intellectual property rights have been violated is encouraged to contact us for prompt resolution.

Third-Party Posting Responsibility Disclaimer: Trialect is a neutral platform that allows third-party sponsors to post funding opportunities for informational purposes only. Sponsors are solely responsible for ensuring that their postings comply with copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property laws. Trialect assumes no liability for any copyright or intellectual property infringements in third-party content and will take appropriate action to address any substantiated claims.

Accuracy and Verification Disclaimer: Trialect makes no warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information provided by sponsors. Users are advised to verify the details of any funding opportunity directly with the sponsor before taking action. Trialect cannot be held liable for any discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies in third-party postings.

Notice and Takedown Policy: Trialect is committed to upholding copyright law and protecting the rights of intellectual property owners. If you believe that content on GrantsBoard infringes your copyright or intellectual property rights, please contact us with detailed information about the claim. Upon receipt of a valid notice, Trialect will promptly investigate and, where appropriate, remove or disable access to the infringing content.

View Funding Opportunity