Verified

Cooperative Agreement for In Vivo High-Resolution Imaging for Inner Ear Visualization

National Institutes of Health

General Information

Document Type:	Grants Notice
Funding Opportunity Number:	RFA-DC-25-003
Funding Opportunity Title:	Cooperative Agreement for In Vivo High-Resolution Imaging for Inner Ear Visualization (U01 Clinical Trial Required)
Opportunity Category:	Discretionary
Opportunity Category Explanation:
Funding Instrument Type:	Cooperative Agreement
Category of Funding Activity:	Health
Category Explanation:
Expected Number of Awards:
Assistance Listings:	93.173 -- Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders
Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement:	No

Version:	Synopsis 1
Posted Date:	Jan 06, 2025
Last Updated Date:	Jan 06, 2025
Original Closing Date for Applications:	Oct 01, 2026
Current Closing Date for Applications:	Oct 01, 2026
Archive Date:	Nov 06, 2026
Estimated Total Program Funding:	$ 500,000
Award Ceiling:	$500,000
Award Floor:	$

Additional Information

Agency Name:	National Institutes of Health
Description:	This funding opportunity aims to support high risk clinical trials for the development of in vivo high-resolution structural and functional imaging technologies for the living human inner ear. Proposed projects should focus on improving the resolution of current imaging techniques or developing new imaging techniques that can visualize inner ear structures in vivo with significantly greater detail and accuracy than currently possible. Structural and functional aspects, including visualizing dynamic elements, are important to developing new and improved techniques. Projects may also focus on developing new imaging probes or contrast agents that can enhance visualization of the inner ear structures. Research supported in response to this RFA is expected to significantly advance the ability to visualize auditory and vestibular components, such as hair cells, otoliths, membranes, ions, and vasculature, in detail in awake patients in a clinical setting using non-invasive techniques. To achieve this goal, a multidisciplinary team approach that takes advantage of the expertise of each team member is highly encouraged. Studies in humans must be proposed to develop,advance, or test the needed technology. Any intermediate studies must articulate a clear path of the proposed methodology to application in awake humans or define the limitations and the usefulness in anesthetized humans.
Link to Additional Information:	https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-DC-25-003.html
Grantor Contact Information:	If you have difficulty accessing the full announcement electronically, please contact: NIH Grants Information grantsinfo@nih.gov

AI Based Application Success Predictor

1. Significance (Importance of the Research Question) (Highest Predictor ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

This is one of NIH's core review criteria.

Competitive proposals should:

Address an important biomedical or public health problem.
Fill a significant knowledge gap.
Advance scientific understanding.
Improve prevention, diagnosis, treatment, or health outcomes.

Reviewers ask whether successful completion of the project will have a meaningful impact on the field.

2. Strong alignment with the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) and Institute priorities (Highest Predictor ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

Competitive applications closely match:

The objectives of the specific FOA.
The mission of the relevant NIH Institute or Center (e.g., NCI, NHLBI, NIDDK, NIAID, NHGRI).
The scientific priorities described in the funding announcement.

Even scientifically strong proposals are less competitive if they do not fit the FOA or Institute mission.

3. Innovation (Highest Predictor ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

Innovation is a formal NIH review criterion.

Competitive proposals often include:

Novel hypotheses.
New technologies.
Innovative methodologies.
Creative experimental approaches.
New therapeutic or diagnostic strategies.
Artificial intelligence or advanced computational methods (when appropriate).

Projects should demonstrate how they advance beyond current knowledge rather than simply extending existing work.

4. Rigorous Approach and Methodology (Highest Predictor ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

The Approach section is often the most heavily scrutinized part of an NIH application.

Competitive proposals include:

Well-defined hypotheses.
Strong preliminary rationale (especially for R01s).
Robust experimental design.
Appropriate statistical analyses.
Risk mitigation strategies.
Alternative approaches.
Realistic timelines and milestones.

A weak approach can prevent funding even for highly innovative ideas.

5. Investigator(s) and Team Expertise (Very High Predictor ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

Reviewers evaluate whether the investigators have the expertise to complete the proposed work.

Competitive teams demonstrate:

Strong publication record.
Relevant scientific expertise.
Leadership experience.
Complementary multidisciplinary skills.
Successful collaboration.

For early-stage investigators, reviewers place greater emphasis on potential and mentorship.

6. Strong Research Environment (Very High Predictor ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

The institutional environment should provide:

Appropriate laboratories and equipment.
Core facilities.
Clinical infrastructure (when applicable).
Biostatistical support.
Institutional commitment.
Collaborative opportunities.

A strong research environment increases confidence that the project can be successfully completed.

7. Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency (Very High Predictor ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

NIH places strong emphasis on:

Scientific rigor.
Reproducibility.
Authentication of key biological resources.
Consideration of sex as a biological variable (when applicable).
Transparent reporting.
Data management and sharing.

Applications should clearly describe how rigor and reproducibility will be ensured throughout the study.

8. Strong Preliminary Data (especially for R01s) (High Predictor ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆)

For many NIH mechanisms—particularly R01—competitive applications often include preliminary data demonstrating:

Feasibility.
Technical capability.
Early proof of concept.
Supporting evidence for the central hypothesis.

Mechanisms such as R21 may place less emphasis on preliminary data, depending on the FOA.

9. Potential for Translation and Public Health Impact (High Predictor ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆)

Competitive proposals often describe how the research could lead to:

New diagnostics.
New therapeutics.
Clinical trials.
Precision medicine.
Public health interventions.
Improved healthcare delivery.

Even basic science applications benefit from articulating their long-term translational relevance.

10. Appropriate Budget, Data Sharing, and Compliance (High Predictor ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆)

Strong applications include:

Well-justified budgets.
Realistic resource requests.
Data Management and Sharing Plans (required for applicable applications).
Compliance with NIH policies on human subjects, vertebrate animals, inclusion, and research ethics.

Administrative completeness and compliance support a smoother review process.

Specialties

Others

Otolaryngology

Eligibility Requirements

Eligible Applicants:

County governments
State governments
Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education
Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification)
Special district governments
Public housing authorities/Indian housing authorities
Native American tribal governments (Federally recognized)
Independent school districts
Private institutions of higher education
Small businesses
City or township governments
Native American tribal organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments)
Nonprofits that do not have a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education
Public and State controlled institutions of higher education
For profit organizations other than small businesses

Additional Information on Eligibility:

Other Eligible Applicants include the following: Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions; Asian American Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institutions (AANAPISISs); Eligible Agencies of the Federal Government; Faith-based or Community-based Organizations; Hispanic-serving Institutions; Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs); Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Other than Federally Recognized); Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations); Regional Organizations; Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs) ; U.S. Territory or Possession.

Eligible Countries:

United States

Sponsor Details

Sponsor Institute/Organizations: National Institutes of Health

Sponsor Type: Government/Federal

Address: 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892

Legal & Affiliation Disclaimer

Affiliation Disclaimer: Trialect operates independently and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by any sponsors or organizations posting on the GrantsBoard platform. As an independent aggregator of publicly available funding opportunities, Trialect provides equal access to information for all users without endorsing any specific funding source, content, organization, or sponsor. Trialect assumes no responsibility for the content posted by sponsors or third parties.

Subscription Disclaimer: Upon logging into Trialect, you may choose to SUBSCRIBE to GrantsBoard for timely notifications of funding opportunities and to access exclusive benefits, such as priority alerts, reminders, personalized recommendations, and additional application support. However, users are advised to contact sponsors directly for any questions and are not required to subscribe to engage with funding opportunities.

Content Ownership and Copyright Disclaimer: Trialect respects the intellectual property rights of all organizations and individuals. All content posted on GrantsBoard is provided solely for informational purposes and remains the property of the original owners. Trialect does not claim ownership of, nor does it have any proprietary interest in, content provided by third-party sponsors. Users are encouraged to verify content and ownership directly with the posting sponsor.

Fair Use Disclaimer: The information and content available on GrantsBoard are compiled from publicly accessible sources in alignment with fair use principles under U.S. copyright law. Trialect serves as an aggregator of this content, offering it to users in good faith and with the understanding that it is available for public dissemination. Any organization or individual who believes their intellectual property rights have been violated is encouraged to contact us for prompt resolution.

Third-Party Posting Responsibility Disclaimer: Trialect is a neutral platform that allows third-party sponsors to post funding opportunities for informational purposes only. Sponsors are solely responsible for ensuring that their postings comply with copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property laws. Trialect assumes no liability for any copyright or intellectual property infringements in third-party content and will take appropriate action to address any substantiated claims.

Accuracy and Verification Disclaimer: Trialect makes no warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information provided by sponsors. Users are advised to verify the details of any funding opportunity directly with the sponsor before taking action. Trialect cannot be held liable for any discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies in third-party postings.

Notice and Takedown Policy: Trialect is committed to upholding copyright law and protecting the rights of intellectual property owners. If you believe that content on GrantsBoard infringes your copyright or intellectual property rights, please contact us with detailed information about the claim. Upon receipt of a valid notice, Trialect will promptly investigate and, where appropriate, remove or disable access to the infringing content.

View Funding Opportunity