Not Verified

APA Achievement Award for Early Career Psychologists

American Psychological Association

The Committee on Early Career Psychologists (CECP) is pleased to announce the call for the Early Career Psychologists Achievement Awards. Awards will be given to distinguished early career psychologists (ECPs) working in any area of psychology (e.g., education, practice, public interest, applied, and science) who have made a significant impact on psychology and/or society.

Three awardees will be selected and granted $1,000 each. Individuals may be eligible for more than one award. Applicants are asked to please apply for all awards for which they are eligible.

Award A: Award designated to two ECPs who have made a significant impact on psychology and/or society.

Award B: One award designated to an ECP whose professional contributions, scholarship, or service demonstrate a commitment to addressing the needs of underserved populations facing documented barriers to care, including but not limited to communities disproportionately affected by social, economic, or geographic disadvantage.

How to Apply

Applicants will need to address the following (200 word maximum per answer):

Clear examples of your distinguished service in any area of psychology, including but not limited to professional service, advocacy, scholarly contributions, education, and/or practice
Clear examples of the significant impact your work has had on psychology and/or society
Clear connections of how your application aligns with the CECP priorities listed below:
- Prioritizing equity, diversity, and inclusion in every aspect of our work
- Engaging in anti-racist work
- Establishing and promoting leadership training opportunities for ECPs
- Creating new opportunities for ECPs to serve in leadership positions
- Elevating the visibility of ECPs and their work
If applying for Award B, clear examples of your professional work that demonstrates a commitment to addressing the needs of underserved populations facing documented barriers to care, including but not limited to communities disproportionately affected by social, economic, or geographic disadvantage.
Curriculum vitae
Letter of recommendation
- A letter of recommendation from an individual who can attest to your distinguished contributions and impact on psychology and/or society (no more than 1-page single spaced, 12-point font)

AI Based Application Success Predictor

1. Direct psychology/behavioral-science relevance ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

The project should have psychology or behavioral science at its core, rather than merely using a psychological questionnaire as a small component.

Strong areas include:

Clinical psychology
Counseling psychology
Health psychology
Behavioral medicine
Cognitive psychology
Developmental psychology
Social psychology
Educational psychology
Neuropsychology
Community psychology
Industrial/organizational psychology
Forensic psychology
Psychological assessment
Mental-health interventions
Behavioral health

A general medical study with no substantial psychological/behavioral research question would have weak APA alignment.

2. Important psychological or behavioral-health problem ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

A competitive proposal should address a clearly defined problem.

Examples include:

Anxiety
Depression
Trauma
Stress
Addiction/substance use
Suicide prevention
Chronic pain and psychological functioning
Behavioral health disparities
Child/adolescent mental health
Aging and cognition
Health behavior
Sleep and psychological health
Social isolation
Workplace mental health
Learning and educational outcomes

The proposal should establish:

Important problem → evidence gap → research question → expected benefit.

3. Scientific merit ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

A strong APA-oriented proposal should have a clearly defined research question or hypothesis.

Reviewers should understand:

What is known?
What is unknown?
Why does the gap matter?
What theory or model guides the research?
What will the study test?
What new knowledge will be generated?

A particularly strong proposal connects psychological theory with empirical testing.

4. Societal and patient impact ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Research is strengthened when the findings can improve:

Mental-health outcomes
Psychological functioning
Quality of life
Prevention
Treatment
Educational outcomes
Workplace well-being
Family functioning
Community health
Public-health policy

For example:

Risk factor → psychological mechanism → intervention → improved mental-health outcome

provides a strong impact pathway.

5. Methodological rigor ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Competitive psychology research should use appropriate and transparent methods.

Important elements include:

Clearly defined population
Validated psychological measures
Appropriate comparison groups
Adequate sample size
Appropriate statistical methods
Longitudinal design where necessary
Appropriate handling of missing data
Predefined primary outcomes
Reproducible procedures
Ethical protections

For intervention studies, consider:

Randomization
Control condition
Treatment fidelity
Blinding where feasible
Follow-up assessment

6. Innovation ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Innovation can come from the research question, theory, methodology, intervention, population, or technology.

Potentially strong areas include:

Digital mental health

Mobile interventions
Telepsychology
Digital therapeutics
AI-assisted behavioral interventions

Psychological assessment

Novel assessment tools
Digital phenotyping
Computational assessment

Behavioral science

New models of health behavior
Social/behavioral mechanisms
Decision-making

Clinical psychology

New intervention approaches
Personalized psychological treatment
Prevention models

Innovation should be more than simply applying a new technology; it should address an important psychological problem.

7. Investigator qualifications and mentorship ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆

Research experience and appropriate mentorship can be important, particularly for early-career investigators.

Strong applicants demonstrate:

Relevant academic training
Research experience
Publications
Methodological expertise
Clinical experience where appropriate
Appropriate statistical expertise
Strong mentorship

For junior investigators, the proposal should show how the funding will help establish an independent research trajectory.

8. Diversity, equity and underserved populations ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆

Depending on the specific APA program, research addressing disparities can be particularly compelling.

Potential areas include:

Mental-health disparities
Access to psychological services
Culturally responsive interventions
Underserved communities
Rural populations
Socioeconomic disparities
Disability
Aging populations
Children and adolescents
Historically underrepresented groups

However, diversity should be incorporated meaningfully into the research question and methodology, rather than added as a superficial statement.

9. Feasibility ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

The project should demonstrate access to:

Appropriate participants
Clinical/community settings
Psychological assessment tools
Research staff
Statistical support
Data-management infrastructure
Intervention facilities where required

A focused project that can produce meaningful preliminary data is often more convincing than an overly ambitious study.

10. Dissemination and future research ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆

A strong project should have potential beyond the immediate grant.

Possible trajectory:

Pilot study → preliminary evidence → larger grant → multicenter study → clinical/community implementation

Useful outputs include:

Peer-reviewed publications
Conference presentations
Validated assessment tools
Intervention protocols
Clinical guidance
Educational resources
Community implementation

Specialties

Psychology

Eligibility Requirements

Current dues-paid member of APA in any membership category
Doctorate in psychology or a related field within the last 10 years
Agree to a presentation, either in-person or virtually, at an APA convention or a CECP sponsored event

Sponsor Details

Sponsor Institute/Organizations: American Psychological Association

Sponsor Type: Corporate/Non-Profit

Address: 750 First St. NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242

Legal & Affiliation Disclaimer

Affiliation Disclaimer: Trialect operates independently and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by any sponsors or organizations posting on the GrantsBoard platform. As an independent aggregator of publicly available funding opportunities, Trialect provides equal access to information for all users without endorsing any specific funding source, content, organization, or sponsor. Trialect assumes no responsibility for the content posted by sponsors or third parties.

Subscription Disclaimer: Upon logging into Trialect, you may choose to SUBSCRIBE to GrantsBoard for timely notifications of funding opportunities and to access exclusive benefits, such as priority alerts, reminders, personalized recommendations, and additional application support. However, users are advised to contact sponsors directly for any questions and are not required to subscribe to engage with funding opportunities.

Content Ownership and Copyright Disclaimer: Trialect respects the intellectual property rights of all organizations and individuals. All content posted on GrantsBoard is provided solely for informational purposes and remains the property of the original owners. Trialect does not claim ownership of, nor does it have any proprietary interest in, content provided by third-party sponsors. Users are encouraged to verify content and ownership directly with the posting sponsor.

Fair Use Disclaimer: The information and content available on GrantsBoard are compiled from publicly accessible sources in alignment with fair use principles under U.S. copyright law. Trialect serves as an aggregator of this content, offering it to users in good faith and with the understanding that it is available for public dissemination. Any organization or individual who believes their intellectual property rights have been violated is encouraged to contact us for prompt resolution.

Third-Party Posting Responsibility Disclaimer: Trialect is a neutral platform that allows third-party sponsors to post funding opportunities for informational purposes only. Sponsors are solely responsible for ensuring that their postings comply with copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property laws. Trialect assumes no liability for any copyright or intellectual property infringements in third-party content and will take appropriate action to address any substantiated claims.

Accuracy and Verification Disclaimer: Trialect makes no warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information provided by sponsors. Users are advised to verify the details of any funding opportunity directly with the sponsor before taking action. Trialect cannot be held liable for any discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies in third-party postings.

Notice and Takedown Policy: Trialect is committed to upholding copyright law and protecting the rights of intellectual property owners. If you believe that content on GrantsBoard infringes your copyright or intellectual property rights, please contact us with detailed information about the claim. Upon receipt of a valid notice, Trialect will promptly investigate and, where appropriate, remove or disable access to the infringing content.

View Funding Opportunity